Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current Restore this Version View Version History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

Prioritising product initiatives effectively ensures that resources are focused on projects that deliver maximum value, and contribute to the business unit and company achieving it’s strategic goals.

As a Product Manager or Designer at Moniepoint, you will work on initiatives intended to move a KPI:

  • from an existing level

  • to a goal level

  • in a certain timeframe

To help you to do this, we have created the product prioritisation & discovery guidelines.

Following these is intended to help you to be able to approach the problem in a way that will give you the greatest chance of success.

The following guidelines incorporates the RICE methodology, with additional criteria to ensure strategic alignment with Moniepoint’s North Star goal.

[IAN NOTE- RELATE THE FOLLOWING MORE TIGHTLY TO THE KPI]

What is the guideline process for prioritisation?

  1. Gather and list all initiatives

  2. Score each initiative against criteria (RICE + strategic alignment)

  3. Rank initiatives based on scores (including manual review and sense check)

  4. Begin product development and execution based on the prioritised list

Use of these guidelines

These guidelines are based on best practices. Whilst we encourage you to use these guidelines, it is not mandatory and you should approach your task in the way you believe is most likely to achieve your goal.

How closely you follow the prioritisation guidelines will be analysed quarterly. If you chose to deviate from the guidelines and the results are poor, it is likely you will be asked to give your reasons for not following the guidelines, and to follow the guidelines in the future.

If deviating from the guidelines consistently achieves better results, we will learn from this and use the deviations to iterate and improve the guidelines.

Whilst the exact method you use for prioritisation is up to you, you must document your product discovery thoroughly in Confluence. This is non-optional. The end-to-end process for documenting in Confluence is described here.

Detailed steps

Step 1 - Gather and list all initiatives

Objective

Compile a comprehensive list of all potential product initiatives requiring evaluation.

Actions

Collect initiatives:

Gather ideas from various sources, including but not limited to:

  • Feedback from customer success

  • Feedback from your own customer research

  • Data-driven insights

  • Market research

  • Compliance initiatives

  • CEO / executive management requirements

  • Competitive analysis

  • Team brainstorming sessions

Ensure inclusion of both short-term and long-term initiatives.

Document details:

For each initiative, provide a brief description, objectives, expected outcomes, and any supporting data or research. Note the problem it solves, the target audience, and how it aligns with customer and/or company strategic needs.

Focus on quantity:

At this stage, focus on quantity not quality of initiatives. This is to ensure that no valuable opportunities are overlooked. We will filter for quality in subsequent stages.

Step 2 - Score each initiative against criteria (RICE + strategic alignment)

Objective

Evaluate each initiative using standardised criteria to enable objective comparison and ensure alignment with strategic goals.

Evaluation criteria

Reach (R): The number of users/customers affected within a specific time frame

Impact (I): The degree of benefit each user/customer receives from the initiative

Confidence (C): The level of certainty in the estimates of reach and impact

Effort (E): The total amount of work required to complete the initiative

Strategic alignment (S): How well the initiative supports the company's and business unit's strategic objectives, including Moniepoint's North Star goal

Actions

Assign reach scores:

Estimate the number of users/customers impacted over a set period (e.g., per month or quarter). Use actual data if at all possible.

Assign impact scores:

Rate the benefit per user on a standardised scale:

  • 3 (Massive impact): Significant positive change in user behaviour or satisfaction

  • 2 (High impact): Notable improvement in user experience or key metrics

  • 1 (Medium impact): Moderate enhancement to existing features or processes

  • 0.5 (Low impact): Minor improvements with limited effect

  • 0.25 (Minimal impact): Minimal noticeable change to users

Assign confidence scores:

Rate your certainty about reach and impact estimates:

  • 100% (High confidence): Based on solid data and testing

  • 80% (Medium confidence): Based on reliable but incomplete data

  • 50% (Low confidence): Based on assumptions or limited information

Estimate effort:

Approximate the total work required in story points (for consistency with development methodology). Include all resources needed from discovery through to launch (engineering, design, QA, compliance, etc).

Score strategic alignment:

Rate alignment with strategic goals on a scale:

  • 3 (High alignment): Directly supports key strategic objectives

  • 2 (Moderate alignment): Supports strategic objectives but not directly

  • 1 (Low alignment): Indirectly supports or has minimal alignment

Step 3 - Rank initiatives based on scores (including manual review and sense check)

Objective

Calculate priority scores, rank initiatives accordingly, and perform a manual review to ensure practicality and alignment with business insights.

Actions

Calculate priority scores:

Use the enhanced RICE formula incorporating strategic alignment:

Priority score = (Reach×Impact×Confidence×Strategic alignment) / Effort​

For each initiative, compute the priority score using the assigned values

Rank initiatives:

Sort the initiatives in descending order based on their priority scores.

This initial ranking provides a data-driven hierarchy of initiatives.

Manual review & sense check

Review dependencies:

Identify any initiatives that depend on the completion of others, and adjust the ranking to account for these dependencies.

Assess external factors:

Consider market trends, regulatory changes, or competitive pressures that might affect the priority. Modify rankings if certain initiatives have strategic urgency.

Align with strategic goals:

Ensure that the highest-ranked initiatives align with both business unit and company-wide strategic objectives. Re-prioritise if necessary to better support strategic alignment.

Step 4 - Begin product development and execution based on the prioritised list

See product discovery guidelines.

Additional best practices

  • Maintain transparency. Keep the scoring criteria, assigned scores, and rationale accessible to all stakeholders. Transparency saves time as all stakeholders can review context for themselves, builds trust, and facilitates decision-making.

  • Ensure consistency. Apply the same evaluation criteria and scoring scales to all initiatives

  • Stay flexible. Be prepared to adjust priorities as new information emerges or circumstances change. Regularly revisit the prioritisation to keep it aligned with current goals and realities.

  • Document thoroughly. Keep detailed records of all evaluations, scores, and decisions. Documentation supports accountability and serves as a valuable reference. The end-to-end process for documenting in Confluence is described here.